Get high quality AI code reviews
- 90+ point analyses
- AI that understands your code
- Bito vs Greptile
Bito vs Greptile
AI-powered code review tools are quickly becoming essential for modern development teams. Two popular options in this space are Bito and Greptile. Both tools speed up pull request reviews, reduce bugs, and improve code quality — but they differ significantly in features, pricing, and integrations.
If you’re evaluating Bito vs Greptile for your organization, this guide will give you a detailed, up-to-date comparison.
What is Bito?
Bito is an AI Code Review Agent designed to help developers merge pull requests faster and with fewer bugs. It integrates with GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, as well as IDEs like VS Code, JetBrains, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Bito delivers high-quality code reviews by deeply understanding code changes within the context of the entire codebase, ensuring more precise feedback. It employs advanced techniques such as Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) parsing, Symbol indexing, and embeddings to comprehensively analyze code.
Key features include:
- Automated pull request summaries and issue detection
- One-click fix suggestions directly in pull requests
- Specialized AI engineers for security, performance, and scalability reviews
- Incremental review mode (only checks new commits)
- Code review analytics and reporting
- SOC 2 Type II compliance and enterprise deployment options
Bito positions itself as a developer-first tool with flexible pricing and strong IDE support.
What is Greptile?
Greptile is another AI-powered code review bot that integrates directly into GitHub, GitLab, and GitHub Enterprise Server. Greptile focuses on repository-wide context by building a code graph to understand dependencies and relationships.
Key features include:
- Automated AI reviews for pull requests
- Inline comments with suggested fixes
- File-by-file breakdowns and Mermaid diagrams
- Team-specific rule learning (via reactions and comments)
- SOC 2 compliance and self-hosting options
Choosing the right AI code review tool
What people are saying about Bito's AI Code Review Agent
Ganesh
Director of Engineering, Pando
Abhishek
CTO, TrueFoundry
Veltris
Key differences between Bito and Greptile
When comparing Bito vs Greptile, these are the most important differentiators:

1. Production-critical issue detection
2. Focused feedback approach
3. IDE support
4. Specialized review commands
5. Incremental reviews
6. Free plan
7. Pricing
Side-by-side comparison

Below is a side-by-side comparison of Bito and Greptile. Bito’s AI Code Review Agent outperforms Greptile in code review quality, fully understanding the entire codebase and reviewing code like a senior developer on your team.
Code review quality
|
|
|
---|---|---|
In-depth codebase understanding |
|
|
General code review |
|
|
Pull request Summaries |
|
|
Can identify all production-critical issues |
|
|
Inline Fix Suggestions (one-click apply in pull request / click-to-accept for minor issues) |
(one-click apply in pull request) |
(click-to-accept for minor issues) |
Targeted analysis of specific aspects of code (such as security, performance, etc.) |
(/review security, /review performance, etc.) |
|
High-level feedback |
|
|
Custom code review rules and guidelines |
|
|
AI chat |
|
|
Incremental Reviews (only checks new changes) |
|
|
Analytics Dashboard |
|
|
Static code analysis |
|
|
Security vulnerability check |
|
|
Integrations
|
|
|
---|---|---|
GitHub | ||
GitLab | ||
Bitbucket | ||
GitHub (Self-Managed) | ||
GitLab (Self-Managed) | ||
Bitbucket (Self-Managed) | ||
IDE support | (VS Code, JetBrains, Cursor, Windsurf) |
Security & Deployment
|
|
|
---|---|---|
SOC 2 Compliance | ||
Data Privacy |
(Does not store or train on your code) |
(Does not store or train on your code) |
Data encryption |
(Encrypted at rest & transit) |
(Encrypted at rest & transit) |
Self-Hosting |
(Available in Enterprise plan) |
(Available in Enterprise plan) |
Pricing comparison
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Free Tier |
(pull request summaries included) |
(only free for open source) |
Team Plan | $15 per developer/month | $30 per developer/month |
Enterprise Plan | $25 per developer/month + $5 for self-host | Custom pricing |
Discounts | Open-source sponsorships | 100% off for OSS, 50% off for startups |
Bito is generally more cost-effective, since its paid plans start at half the price of Greptile’s.
Which AI code review tool should you choose?
Choose Bito if you want:
- High quality reviews with actionable code suggestions
- Affordable pricing with a free tier
- IDE integrations (VS Code, JetBrains, Cursor, and Windsurf)
- Specialized security & performance review commands
- Incremental reviews to save cost and time
- Team analytics and reporting
Choose Bito if you want:
- A GitHub/GitLab-only tool
- Mermaid diagrams and detailed file breakdowns
- General-purpose code reviews
Why AI code reviews matter more than ever
With developers increasingly relying on AI tools to generate code at unprecedented speed — a practice often called “vibe coding” — the volume of code requiring review has exploded. While AI can help write code faster, it can also introduce subtle bugs and inconsistencies that traditional manual reviews might miss. This makes intelligent, automated code review not just helpful, but essential for maintaining code quality in an AI-accelerated development environment.
Final verdict
Both Bito and Greptile are strong AI code review tools. But in 2025, Bito has a clear edge thanks to its IDE support, lower pricing, free tier, and more advanced review options.
Additionally, Bito’s superior ability to identify production-critical issues and its focused, non-nitpicky approach make it the more practical choice for development teams looking to catch meaningful problems without getting overwhelmed by minor feedback.
If your team wants a cost-effective, developer-friendly AI reviewer that integrates directly into your IDE and pull request workflow, Bito is the better choice.