Introducing Bito’s AI Code Review Agent: cut review effort in half 
Introducing Bito’s AI Code Review Agent: cut review effort in half

Gemini vs GPT-4: Is Gemini better than GPT-4?

Gemini vs GPT-4 Is Gemini better than GPT-4?

Table of Contents

The AI landscape has recently witnessed the advent of two revolutionary models: Google’s Gemini and OpenAI’s GPT-4. Both are pushing the boundaries of what’s possible with AI, yet they differ in fundamental ways.

Wondering is Gemini better than GPT-4? This article is for you!

This article delves into a detailed comparison of Gemini vs GPT-4, focusing on their capabilities, benchmarks, and potential applications.

Overview of Gemini and GPT-4

Gemini: Launched by Google, Gemini is not just one model but a family of models, each designed for specific applications. It includes Gemini Ultra, Gemini Pro, and Gemini Nano, each varying in computational power and intended use. Gemini is natively multimodal, meaning it’s designed to understand and process a range of data types, including text, images, audio, and code.

GPT-4: Developed by OpenAI, GPT-4 is the latest in the Generative Pre-trained Transformer series. It’s a large-scale, multimodal language model known for its ability to generate human-like text. GPT-4 can also process both text and image inputs, making it a versatile tool for a wide range of applications.

Capability and Functionality


  • Natively multimodal, handling text, images, audio, and code seamlessly.
  • Tailored for specific devices and applications, ranging from heavy-duty tasks (Gemini Ultra) to mobile applications (Gemini Nano).
  • Integrated into Google’s ecosystem, including Search and Android devices.


  • Processes text and image inputs, supporting a wide range of languages.
  • Known for its advanced natural language understanding and generation.
  • Used in various applications, from content creation to coding assistance.

Benchmark Performance: Gemini vs GPT-4

To objectively compare Gemini vs GPT-4, let’s look at some benchmark results:

General Reasoning and Comprehension

BenchmarkGemini UltraGPT-4Description
MMLU90.0%86.4%Multitask Language Understanding
Big-Bench Hard83.6%83.1%Multi-step reasoning tasks
DROP82.480.9Reading comprehension
HellaSwag87.8%95.3%Commonsense reasoning for everyday tasks

Mathematical Reasoning

BenchmarkGemini UltraGPT-4Description
GSM8K94.4%92.0%Basic arithmetic and Grade School math problems
MATH53.2%52.9%Advanced math problems

Code Generation

BenchmarkGemini UltraGPT-4Description
HumanEval74.4%67.0%Python code generation
Natural2Code74.9%73.9%Python code generation, new dataset

Image Understanding

BenchmarkGemini UltraGPT-4Description
VQAv277.8%77.2%Natural image understanding
TextVQA82.3%78.0%OCR on natural images
DocVQA90.9%88.4%Document understanding
MMMU59.4%56.8%Multi-discipline reasoning problems

Video Understanding

BenchmarkGemini UltraGPT-4Description
VATEX56.0N/AEnglish video captioning
Perception Test MCQA46.3%N/AVideo question answering

Audio Processing

BenchmarkGemini UltraGPT-4Description
CoVoST 229.1N/AAutomatic speech translation
FLEURS17.6%N/AAutomatic speech recognition

Overall Benchmark Analysis

General Reasoning and Comprehension: Gemini Ultra shows a strong ability to understand and process complex information across various domains. However, GPT-4’s superior performance in commonsense reasoning highlights its capability in more intuitive, everyday contexts.

Mathematical Reasoning: Gemini Ultra’s slight edge in basic arithmetic and equal performance in advanced mathematics suggests that it is well-suited for both educational and complex mathematical problem-solving applications.

Code Generation: The consistent outperformance of Gemini Ultra in code generation tasks underscores its potential in software development, algorithm design, and automation tasks, suggesting a more nuanced understanding of programming languages and logic.

Image Understanding: Gemini Ultra demonstrates a slight edge over GPT-4 in benchmarks like VQAv2 and TextVQA, indicating a more nuanced comprehension of natural images and document understanding. The higher score in MMMU reflects its superior multi-discipline reasoning abilities.

Video Understanding: Gemini’s capabilities in video understanding, as shown in benchmarks like VATEX and Perception Test MCQA, are notable since GPT-4 does not specifically cater to video content processing.

Audio Processing: Gemini Ultra’s performance in benchmarks like CoVoST 2 and FLEURS, aimed at speech translation and recognition, illustrates its proficiency in audio processing, a domain not directly addressed by GPT-4.

Is Gemini better than GPT-4?

Gemini Ultra stands out in its native ability to process different types of data. While GPT-4 can handle text and images, Gemini Ultra extends this to audio and video, offering a more comprehensive multimodal experience.

Applications and Integration


  • Integrated with Google Bard.
  • Tailored versions for different platforms, from heavy-duty cloud applications to on-device solutions.


  • Used in various third-party applications, offering broad integration capabilities.
  • Popular in content creation, language translation, and educational tools.


Gemini and GPT-4 represent two of the most advanced AI models currently available, each with its unique strengths. Gemini’s native multimodality and integration within Google’s ecosystem make it a versatile and powerful tool, especially for audio and video processing. On the other hand, GPT-4’s prowess in language processing and its wide range of applications make it a go-to choice for text-based AI tasks. The choice between Gemini and GPT-4 would largely depend on the specific requirements and the nature of the tasks at hand. As AI continues to evolve, the capabilities and applications of these models are likely to expand, marking an exciting era in the field of artificial intelligence.

Anand Das

Anand Das

Anand is Co-founder and CTO of Bito. He leads technical strategy and engineering, and is our biggest user! Formerly, Anand was CTO of Eyeota, a data company acquired by Dun & Bradstreet. He is co-founder of PubMatic, where he led the building of an ad exchange system that handles over 1 Trillion bids per day.

Amar Goel

Amar Goel

Amar is the Co-founder and CEO of Bito. With a background in software engineering and economics, Amar is a serial entrepreneur and has founded multiple companies including the publicly traded PubMatic and Komli Media.

From Bito team with

This article is brought to you by Bito – an AI developer assistant.

Latest posts

Gemini 1.5 Pro vs GPT-4 Turbo Benchmarks

Meet Bito’s AI Code Review Agent

How to do Code Smells Refactoring in Python the Right Way

SAST vs DAST vs IAST: Key Differences

IAST vs DAST: Key Differences

Top posts

Gemini 1.5 Pro vs GPT-4 Turbo Benchmarks

Meet Bito’s AI Code Review Agent

How to do Code Smells Refactoring in Python the Right Way

SAST vs DAST vs IAST: Key Differences

IAST vs DAST: Key Differences

From the blog

The latest industry news, interviews, technologies, and resources.

Get Bito for IDE of your choice