Get a 1-month FREE trial of Bito’s AI Code Review Agent  
Get a 1-month FREE trial
of Bito’s AI Code Review Agent

Improving Code Quality With GitLab: A Practical Guide

Improving Code Quality With GitLab

Table of Contents

Developing high-quality software is crucial for building maintainable, understandable codebases that stand the test of time. However, as projects grow in complexity and teams expand, consistently writing clean code can become challenging. Thankfully, GitLab provides integrated tools to analyze and monitor code quality within the development workflow.

In this comprehensive guide, we’ll explore how to leverage GitLab’s code quality capabilities to create better, more reliable software.

Introduction to Code Quality

Before diving into using GitLab, let’s first define what code quality entails:

Code quality refers to how well-written, understandable, and maintainable source code is.

Higher quality code tends to have these attributes:

  • Readability – The code is easy to understand for other developers. It uses descriptive naming conventions and avoids overly complex logic.
  • Reliability – The code functions consistently without bugs or errors. It has high test coverage to catch potential issues.
  • Maintainability – The code is easy to modify and extend over time as requirements change. It avoids duplicate logic and has clear abstractions.
  • Simplicity – The code avoids unnecessary complexity. It follows the “keep it simple” mentality.
  • Consistency – The code adheres to defined style guides and patterns. It has consistent formatting and structure.

Monitoring code quality and addressing issues incrementally is crucial for avoiding technical debt accumulation. It also makes onboarding new team members quicker since they don’t have to untangle messy legacy code.

Code Quality in GitLab

GitLab provides built-in ways to analyze code quality within the development workflow. Let’s explore the various options available:

Code Quality Widget

The code quality widget displays quality issues introduced in a merge request. It’s available in all GitLab tiers and provides a quick overview of how the changes in the MR impact quality.

The widget lists any new issues or resolved issues resulting from the merge request. Selecting an issue provides more details.

Code Quality Reports

Detailed code quality reports are available in the pipelines view for Premium and Ultimate tiers. These reports show the full findings from analyzing the code in that particular pipeline.

The reports allow drilling down into each finding including descriptions, locations, and severity.

Project Code Quality Summary

At the project level, GitLab Ultimate offers a summary of overall code quality trends. This dashboard shows how quality has changed over time and provides actionable data to improve the project.

The dashboard highlights files with the most issues, detects quality improvements/regressions between versions, and tracks technical debt estimates.

Custom Tool Integration

In addition to the built-in scanning, GitLab can integrate findings from any code quality tool. To do this, configure the tool to output results as JSON in the Code Quality format. Then, save the report as an artifact in a pipeline job.

This approach provides flexibility to use existing organizational tools and custom quality checks.

Code Climate Integration (Deprecated)

GitLab currently has built-in support for scanning with Code Climate and its official plugins. However, this integration has limited language support and will eventually be deprecated as GitLab focuses on custom tool integration.

Best Practices for Improving Code Quality

Now that we’ve explored GitLab’s code quality capabilities, let’s discuss best practices for leveraging them effectively:

1. Enable Code Quality by Default

Adding a code quality job to .gitlab-ci.yml for every project makes quality scanning a default part of your process. Developers will be accustomed to seeing quality reports in all merge requests.


  stage: test

  image: docker/code-quality:latest


    - # run code quality tool  



      codequality: gl-code-quality-report.json

At the project level, regularly check the quality dashboard for overall trends. Watch for downward trajectories in quality over time. Then, prioritize addressing those issues to avoid accumulating technical debt.

3. Use Code Quality Gates

Require code quality to stay constant or improve before merging changes. Do this by creating a merge request approval rule that blocks merges that degrade quality.

This enforces quality standards without being overly restrictive on developers.

4. Integrate Existing Tools

Output findings from existing organizational tools using the Code Quality JSON format. This avoids disruption by leveraging current tools while benefiting from GitLab integration.

5. Combine Multiple Tools

Use findings from complementary tools together for the best results. For example, integrate a linter, complexity analyzer, and custom organizational checker to get a comprehensive view.

Different tools will catch different issues that any single one would miss.


Using GitLab’s flexible code quality capabilities encourages writing better code and avoiding technical debt accumulation. By enabling quality checks across all projects, regularly reviewing quality trends, integrating existing tools, and combining findings from multiple checkers, development teams can create more maintainable, understandable software.

Consistently monitoring code quality during development is essential for building high-quality applications able to stand the test of time and evolution.

Anand Das

Anand Das

Anand is Co-founder and CTO of Bito. He leads technical strategy and engineering, and is our biggest user! Formerly, Anand was CTO of Eyeota, a data company acquired by Dun & Bradstreet. He is co-founder of PubMatic, where he led the building of an ad exchange system that handles over 1 Trillion bids per day.

Amar Goel

Amar Goel

Amar is the Co-founder and CEO of Bito. With a background in software engineering and economics, Amar is a serial entrepreneur and has founded multiple companies including the publicly traded PubMatic and Komli Media.

From Bito team with

This article is brought to you by Bito – an AI developer assistant.

Latest posts

Bridging the Gap: AI Code Review vs Static Analysis Tools

Nitpicking in Code Reviews: Helpful or Harmful?

Are LLMs Commoditizing?

Major upgrades to the AI Code Review Agent and IDE extensions

The Hidden Cost of Code Review: Navigating Emotional Landscapes

Top posts

Bridging the Gap: AI Code Review vs Static Analysis Tools

Nitpicking in Code Reviews: Helpful or Harmful?

Are LLMs Commoditizing?

Major upgrades to the AI Code Review Agent and IDE extensions

The Hidden Cost of Code Review: Navigating Emotional Landscapes

From the blog

The latest industry news, interviews, technologies, and resources.

Get Bito for IDE of your choice