Faster, better AI-powered code reviews. Start your free trial!  
Faster, better AI-powered code reviews.
Start your free trial!

Get high quality AI code reviews

Webassembly Vs Javascript Performance: Javascript Explained

Table of Contents

The comparison between Webassembly and Javascript performance is a hot topic among web developers today. Both programming languages have different strengths that play into their role in the ever-evolving web development landscape. Understanding the differences between Webassembly and Javascript will help developers choose the best option for their project. This article will discuss what they are, performance comparisons, advantages, browser compatibility, security considerations, development complexity, debugging tools, and tips to enhance performance.

What is Webassembly?

Webassembly (WASM) is a low-level, portable bytecode format for the web. It was developed as an alternative to JavaScript to improve the performance of web applications. It is an open standard maintained by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). Due to its performance advantages, WASM is becoming increasingly popular amongst developers. WASM code can be compiled from source languages such as C and C++, allowing developers to link their existing programs with the web capabilities.

WASM is also designed to be secure, with built-in memory safety features that prevent buffer overflows and other security vulnerabilities. This makes it an attractive choice for developers who need to ensure the security of their applications. Additionally, WASM is designed to be platform-independent, meaning that it can be used on any device or operating system. This makes it a great choice for developers who need to create applications that can run on multiple platforms.

What is Javascript?

JavaScript (JS) is a scripting language supported by all modern browsers. It is used for developing interactive and dynamic web applications. By enabling developers to run code in the user’s browser rather than on a server, JS based web pages are much faster and more responsive. JS is also highly versatile and can be used to build complex solutions. Over the years, JS has become increasingly popular, with an extensive list of frameworks and libraries available.

JS is a powerful language that can be used to create a wide range of applications, from simple web pages to complex web applications. It is also used to create mobile applications, desktop applications, and even games. With its flexibility and scalability, JS is a great choice for developers looking to create dynamic and interactive web experiences.

Performance Comparisons of Webassembly and Javascript

When comparing Webassembly vs Javascript performance, WASM offers considerable performance improvements. WASM code is faster and more efficient to execute than JS due to its binary format. Due to its compilation process, WASM applications can be compiled with optimization enabled which leads to faster execution times. On the other hand, JS code is slower to execute due to its interpreted nature, although it can be optimized using various techniques. In addition, JS is also more prone to code size and memory bloat issues as compared to WASM.

Furthermore, WASM is more secure than JS as it is sandboxed and runs in a secure environment. This makes it more difficult for malicious code to be injected into the application. Additionally, WASM is more portable than JS as it can be used across different platforms and browsers. This makes it easier to develop and deploy applications on multiple platforms without having to rewrite the code.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Webassembly and Javascript

WASM offers an array of advantages over JS. WASM is faster, more efficient in terms of both speed and memory usage, and can be optimized with optimization flags such as –O3. On the other hand, JS is lightweight, versatile, easily debugged, and comes with a wide variety of frameworks and libraries available to make development fast and simple. Its disadvantage over WASM relates to performance – it has slower execution times due to its interpreted nature.

In addition, WASM is more secure than JS, as it is compiled and not interpreted. This means that malicious code is less likely to be executed, as it is more difficult to inject malicious code into a compiled language. Furthermore, WASM is more portable than JS, as it can be used across different platforms and browsers. This makes it easier to develop applications that can be used on multiple platforms.

Browser Compatibility for Webassembly and Javascript

Both WASM and JS are supported by all modern browsers. WASM code is supported by Chrome 61+, Firefox 52+ and Safari 11+. For JS, support depends on the version of ECMAScript used in the code – ES5 is supported by virtually any browser while ES6 has partial support in Edge and IE11 with full support in Edge 16+, Chrome 62+, Firefox 60+, Safari 10+.

It is important to note that while WASM and JS are both supported by modern browsers, the performance of WASM is generally much better than that of JS. This is because WASM is compiled to native machine code, while JS is interpreted by the browser. As a result, WASM code can be executed much faster than JS code.

Security Considerations for Webassembly and Javascript

When considering which language is more secure for developing applications, WASM is generically more secure than JS due to its binary format. With WASM, code cannot be read or modified as easily as it can in JS. In addition, WASM applications are compiled with optimization flags which can allow runtime errors or malicious code to remain hidden until later down the line when they are detected. On the other hand, JS applications are more prone to user-introduced errors and malicious code running in the user’s environment.

WASM also offers better memory safety than JS, as it is designed to be memory-safe by default. This means that WASM applications are less likely to suffer from memory-related vulnerabilities, such as buffer overflows and use-after-free errors. In contrast, JS applications are more prone to memory-related vulnerabilities due to the lack of memory safety features.

Development Complexity between Webassembly and Javascript

The complexity of WASM vs JS depends on individual use cases. Development with WASM is generally considered more difficult than with JS as it requires more familiarity with lower-level programming concepts such as memory management and data structures. On the other hand, developing with JS increases readability and is generally simpler to debug as it is an interpreted language that allows for easier interaction with third-party libraries.

WASM is also more secure than JS as it is a compiled language, meaning that it is more difficult for malicious actors to modify the code. Additionally, WASM is more efficient than JS as it is compiled to native machine code, allowing for faster execution times. However, this efficiency comes at the cost of increased development complexity.

Debugging Tools for Webassembly and Javascript

Debugging tools for WASM are still immature as compared to JS. For debugging WASM applications, developers can use either command line debugger or through a browser-based development console. For debugging JS applications however, there are a wide range of browser-based development consoles that enable developers to quickly locate and fix issues in their code.

Tips for Enhancing Performance with Javascript

When optimizing an online application built with JavaScript it is important to keep certain points in mind to ensure best performance. Developers should opt for minimize library use and minimize AJAX requests as much as possible. Make sure that the code is organized properly by using OOP (object-oriented programming) concepts like inheritance, encapsulation and polymorphism. In addition, caching static resources when possible will also increase load times for users accessing the application.

In conclusion, both Webassembly and Javascript offer unique advantages over each other depending on individual use cases. As developers strive for more engaging web experiences on different platforms, understanding both languages allows for creating the best optimized solutions depending on the desired outcomes.

Nisha Kumari

Nisha Kumari

Nisha Kumari, a Founding Engineer at Bito, brings a comprehensive background in software engineering, specializing in Java/J2EE, PHP, HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and web development. Her career highlights include significant roles at Accenture, where she led end-to-end project deliveries and application maintenance, and at PubMatic, where she honed her skills in online advertising and optimization. Nisha's expertise spans across SAP HANA development, project management, and technical specification, making her a versatile and skilled contributor to the tech industry.

Written by developers for developers

This article was handcrafted with by the Bito team.

Latest posts

Mastering Python’s writelines() Function for Efficient File Writing | A Comprehensive Guide

Understanding the Difference Between == and === in JavaScript – A Comprehensive Guide

Compare Two Strings in JavaScript: A Detailed Guide for Efficient String Comparison

Exploring the Distinctions: == vs equals() in Java Programming

Understanding Matplotlib Inline in Python: A Comprehensive Guide for Visualizations

Top posts

Mastering Python’s writelines() Function for Efficient File Writing | A Comprehensive Guide

Understanding the Difference Between == and === in JavaScript – A Comprehensive Guide

Compare Two Strings in JavaScript: A Detailed Guide for Efficient String Comparison

Exploring the Distinctions: == vs equals() in Java Programming

Understanding Matplotlib Inline in Python: A Comprehensive Guide for Visualizations

Get Bito for IDE of your choice